من أنا
المقالات
الوظائف
التواصل معي

Disclosure, transparency and performance evaluation

Governance that cannot be seen is not believed. Disclosure is the window through which the shareholder, the lender and the regulator take comfort, and evaluation is the mirror in which the board sees itself.

Chapter 1 · Lesson 5 of 59 min readBeginner level

Disclosure is not a pile of paperwork; it is the right information reaching, in time, whoever will base a decision on it, in language they understand. Anything else is noise.

1 What is disclosed?

Type of disclosureExamplesTiming
Periodic financial Quarterly and annual financial statements Within the statutory deadlines
Material developments A major contract, a significant loss, a change in leadership, an important lawsuit As soon as the company becomes aware, without delay
Governance Composition of the board and committees, meetings and attendance, policies In the annual report
Remuneration Remuneration of members and senior executives In the annual report
Related parties Business and contracts with related parties On approval and in the annual report

The materiality test

Information is material if, were it known, it would change the decision of a reasonable investor. That test is the dividing line between what must be disclosed and what need not be.

2 The board’s annual report

This is the document in which the board presents the year to the shareholders. It usually covers:

  • Business results, the main developments and future plans.
  • The composition of the board and its committees, the number of meetings and each member’s attendance.
  • Remuneration of board members and senior executives.
  • The results of the annual review of the effectiveness of internal control.
  • Business and contracts with related parties.
  • Which governance provisions were applied and which were not, with the reasons.

“Comply or explain”

Some governance provisions are guiding rather than mandatory: a company may choose not to apply them, but it must disclose that and explain why. Silence about non-application is the breach, not the non-application itself.

3 Evaluating the board’s performance

1
Criteria set in advance

What will be measured and who measures it

2
Collecting assessments

Self, peer, or an external party

3
Gap analysis

Missing skills or weak attendance

4
Improvement plan

Training, a change of composition, or amending the charter

Evaluation is not about holding individuals to account; it is about improving the board’s ability to do its job

Board performance is usually measured with indicators such as: meeting attendance rates, the quality of the papers provided beforehand, the diversity of members’ experience, the speed of decision-making, follow-up on what was decided, and the effectiveness of the committees.

4 Markers of effective governance

IndicatorWhat it signals
Proportion of independent members on the oversight committeesThe committee’s ability to object independently
Number of audit findings closed on timeSerious follow-up, not mere detection
Time taken to disclose material eventsDiscipline in transparency
Number of whistleblowing reports handledThe existence of a safe reporting culture
Periodic updating of policies and authoritiesLiving governance rather than dated documents
A practical example

A company lost a contract representing 30% of its revenue. Management wanted to postpone the announcement until it had signed a replacement, “so the share price is not affected”.

The correct treatment: the news is material and affects investors’ decisions, so it is disclosed immediately along with the expected impact and the alternative plans. Delay is a breach, and it costs the company its credibility when it comes out — the market punishes concealment more harshly than it punishes the bad news itself.

Chapter 1 summary

  • Disclosure: correct information, in time, in understandable language, to everyone at once.
  • The materiality test decides what must be disclosed.
  • The board’s annual report brings together performance, governance, remuneration and related parties.
  • “Comply or explain”: not applying a provision is acceptable; concealing that is not.
  • Board performance evaluation is an improvement tool, and governance indicators reveal whether it is alive or merely formal.

5 Test your understanding

Three quick questions

Pick the answer you believe is correct and you will see the result immediately.

1. When is information considered material?

2. The company did not apply a guiding provision of the governance regulations. What must it do?

3. Which indicator points to living rather than formal governance?

Sources and review: the disclosure requirements, the content of the board’s report and the “comply or explain” rule per the framework of the Corporate Governance Regulations issued by the Capital Market Authority in the Kingdom and the applicable disclosure rules, together with the international governance principles. Last reviewed: September 2026. Requirements differ by company type and sector, so refer to the text of the regulations when applying them.