من أنا
المقالات
الوظائف
التواصل معي

Performance management

It is not a form filled in each December. It is an agreement on what is required, follow-up throughout the year, and a frank conversation when things go off course.

Chapter 1 · Lesson 4 of 510 min readBeginner level

No employee should be surprised by their appraisal. If the year-end result comes as a shock to them, the failure is in the follow-up throughout the year, not in the form.

1 The performance management cycle

1
Planning

Agreed objectives, written down

2
Follow-up

Regular check-ins and feedback

3
Appraisal

Reviewing the evidence and the results

4
Reward and development

Linking the outcome to incentives and a plan

An annual cycle that keeps turning — not a single event at the end of the year

2 A good objective

A good objective is specific, measurable, achievable, relevant to the department’s goals, and time-bound.

A weak objectiveA good objective
Improve the speed of the closeClose the accounts within 7 working days of month end, starting in Q2
Reduce errorsCut invoice entry errors to under 1% of total invoices per month
Self-developmentComplete the data analysis programme and apply it in two quarterly reports before year end

Balancing objectives

Do not build every objective on quantity. Combine a result (numbers) with a behaviour (collaboration, accuracy, reliability). Someone who hits the number while wrecking the work of others has not succeeded.

3 Feedback

  • Prompt: close to the event, not months later.
  • Specific: describing a particular behaviour and situation, not a general trait of the person.
  • Balanced: given for good work as readily as for shortfalls.
  • Forward-looking: ending in an agreement about what will happen next time.
Two versions of the same feedback

Weak: “You’re disorganised and always late.”

Professional: “The quarterly report reached me three days after the deadline, which delayed presenting it to management. What held it up? Let’s agree that you send me a draft two days before the deadline next time.”

The difference: the first is a judgement on the person that provokes defensiveness; the second describes an incident and ends in an actionable agreement.

4 Appraisal biases

BiasDescriptionRemedy
RecencyJudging on the last two months and forgetting the rest of the yearA record of achievements and observations kept all year
Central tendencyGiving everyone an average rating to avoid awkwardnessRequiring every rating to be justified with evidence
Leniency or severityOne manager rates everyone high, another rates everyone lowCalibration between managers before results are approved
Halo effectOne attribute generalised to every dimensionRating each criterion separately
Personal biasFavouring whoever resembles us or flatters usWritten evidence and a second-party review

5 Handling underperformance

When weak performance persists despite feedback, a written performance improvement plan is opened, covering:

  • A description of the gap in facts and figures, not impressions.
  • The expectation, clearly: what exactly is the required standard?
  • The support offered: training, coaching, or a change in how tasks are allocated.
  • A defined period with check-in points along the way.
  • The possible outcome if performance does not improve.

A legal caution

Disciplinary action and termination are governed by labour law, with conditions, procedures and notice periods that must be followed. Address performance managerially first, and consult the law and a specialist before any termination decision.

Lesson summary

  • Performance management is a cycle: planning, follow-up, appraisal, reward and development.
  • A good objective is specific, measurable, relevant and time-bound.
  • Balance result objectives with behaviour objectives.
  • Feedback is prompt, specific, balanced, and ends in an agreement.
  • A performance improvement plan is written, with the gap, the support, a period and a possible outcome.

6 Test your understanding

Three quick questions

Pick the answer you believe is correct and you will see the result immediately.

1. A manager gave their whole team a “good” rating with no differentiation. Which appraisal bias is this?

2. Which objective is best worded?

3. An employee was surprised by a poor year-end appraisal. Where does the fault usually lie?

Sources and review: performance management practices and common appraisal biases per the human resources literature. The examples are illustrative. Disciplinary action and termination should be taken from the applicable labour law. Last reviewed: September 2026.